"DEVELOPING
HIGH ACHIEVERS"
Originally
published as
"Early Neurological Stimulation"
by Carmen
L. Battaglia
Surprising as it may seem, it
isn't capacity that explains the
differences that exist between
individuals because most seem to have
far more capacity than they will ever
use. The differences that exist between
individuals seem to be related to
something else. The ones who achieve and
out perform others seem to have within
themselves the ability to use hidden
resources. In other words, it's what
they are able to do with what they have
that makes the difference.
In
many animal-breeding programs the entire
process of selection and management is
founded on the belief that performance
is inherited. Attempts to analyze the
genetics of performance in a systematic
way have involved some distinguished
names such as Charles Darwin and Francis
Galton. But it has only been in recent
decades that good estimates of
heritability of performance have been
based on adequate data. Cunningham
(1991) in his study of horses found that
only by using Timeform data, and
measuring groups of half brothers and
half sisters could good estimates of
performance be determined. His data
shows that performance for speed is
about 35% heritable. In other words only
about 35% of all the variation that is
observed in track performance is
controlled by heritable factors; the
remaining 65% are attributable to other
influences, such as training, management
and nutrition. Cunningham's work while
limited to horses provides a good basis
for understanding how much breeders can
attribute to the genetics and the
pedigrees.
Researchers
have studied this phenomena and have
looked for new ways to stimulate
individuals in order to improve their
natural abilities. Some of the methods
discovered have produced life long
lasting effects. Today, many of the
differences between individuals can now
be explained by the use of early
stimulation methods.
Introduction
Man
for centuries has tried various methods
to improve performance. Some of the
methods have stood the test of time,
others have not. Those who first
conducted research on this topic
believed that the period of early age
was a most important time for
stimulation because of its rapid growth
and development. Today, we know that
early life is a time when the physical
immaturity of an organism is susceptible
and responsive to a restricted but
important class of stimuli. Because of
its importance many studies have focused
their efforts on the first few months of
life.
Newborn pups are uniquely
different than adults in several
respects. When born their eyes are
closed and their digestive system has a
limited capacity requiring periodic
stimulation by their dam who routinely
licks them in order to promote
digestion. At this age they are only
able to smell, suck, and crawl. Body
temperature is maintained by snuggling
close to their mother or by crawling
into piles with other littermates.
During these first few weeks of
immobility researchers noted that these
immature and under-developed canines are
sensitive to a restricted class of
stimuli which includes thermal, and
tactile stimulation, motion and
locomotion.
Other mammals such as mice and
rats are also born with limitations and
they also have been found to demonstrate
a similar sensitivity to the effects of
early stimulation. Studies show that
removing them from their nest for three
minutes each day during the first five
to ten days of life causes body
temperatures to fall below normal. This
mild form of stress is sufficient to
stimulate hormonal, adrenal and
pituitary systems. When tested later as
adults, these same animals were better
able to withstand stress than
littermates who were not exposed to the
same early stress exercises. As adults,
they responded to stress in "a graded"
fashion, while their non-stressed
littermates responded in an "all or
nothing way."
Data
involving laboratory mice and rats also
shows that stress in small amounts can
produce adults who respond maximally. On
the other hand, the results gathered
from non-stressed littermate show that
they become easily exhausted and would
near death if exposed to intense
prolonged stress. When tied down so they
were unable to move for twenty-four
hours, rats developed severe stomach
ulcers, but litter mates exposed to
early stress handling were found to be
more resistant to stress tests and did
not show evidence of ulcers. A secondary
affect was also noticed.
Sexual maturity was attained
sooner in the littermates given early
stress exercises. When tested for
differences in health and disease, the
stressed animals were found to be more
resistant to certain forms of cancer and
infectious diseases and could withstand
terminal starvation and exposure to cold
for longer periods than their
non-stressed littermates. Other studies
involving early stimulation exercises
have been successfully performed on both
cats and dogs. In these studies, the
Electrical Encephalogram (EEG) was found
to be ideal for measuring the electrical
activity in the brain because of its
extreme sensitivity to changes in
excitement, emotional stress, muscle
tension, changes in oxygen and
breathing. EEG measures show that pups
and kittens when given early stimulation
exercises mature at faster rates and
perform better in certain problem
solving tests than non-stimulated mates.
In the higher level animals the effect
of early stimulation exercises have also
been studied. The use of surrogate
mothers and familiar objects were tested
by both of the Kelloggs' and Dr. Yearkes
using young chimpanzees. Their pioneer
research shows that the more primates
were deprived of stimulation and
interaction during early development,
the less able they were to cope, adjust
and later adapt to situations as adults.
While experiments have not yet
produced specific information about the
optimal amounts of stress needed to make
young animals psychologically or
physiologically superior, researches
agree that stress has value. What also
is known is that a certain amount of
stress for one may be too intense for
another, and that too much stress can
retard development. The results show
that early stimulation exercises can
have positive results but must be used
with caution. In other words, too much
stress can cause pathological
adversities rather than physical or
psychological superiority.
Methods of Stimulation
The
U.S. Military in their canine program
developed a method that still serves as
a guide to what works. In an effort to
improve the performance of dogs used for
military purposes, a program called "Bio
Sensor" was developed. Later, it became
known to the public as the "Super Dog"
Program. Based on years of research, the
military learned that early neurological
stimulation exercises could have
important and lasting effects. Their
studies confirmed that there are
specific time periods early in life when
neurological stimulation has optimum
results. The first period involves a
window of time that begins at the third
day of life and lasts until the
sixteenth day. It is believed that
because this interval of time is a
period of rapid neurological growth and
development, and therefore is of great
importance to the individual.
The
"Bio Sensor" program was also concerned
with early neurological stimulation in
order to give the dog a superior
advantage. Its development utilized six
exercises which were designed to
stimulate the neurological system. Each
workout involved handling puppies once
each day. The workouts required handling
them one at a time while performing a
series of five exercises. Listed in
order of preference the handler starts
with one pup and stimulates it using
each of the five exercises. The handler
completes the series from beginning to
end before starting with the next pup.
The handling of each pup once per day
involves the following exercises:
1.
Tactical stimulation (between toes)
- Holding the pup in one hand, the
handler gently stimulates (tickles)
the pup between the toes on any one
foot using a Q-tip. It is not
necessary to see that the pup is
feeling the tickle. Time of
stimulation 3 - 5 seconds.
2.
Head held erect
- Using both hands, the pup is held
perpendicular to the ground,
(straight up), so that its head is
directly above its tail. This is an
upwards position. Time of
stimulation 3 - 5 seconds
3.
Head pointed down
- Holding the pup firmly with both
hands the head is reversed and is
pointed downward so that it is
pointing towards the ground. Time of
stimulation 3 - 5 seconds
4.
Supine position
- Hold the pup so that its back is
resting in the palm of both hands
with its muzzle facing the ceiling.
The pup while on its back is allowed
to sleep struggle. Time of
stimulation 3-5 seconds.
5.
Thermal stimulation
- Use a damp towel that has been
cooled in a refrigerator for at
least five minutes. Place the pup on
the towel, feet down. Do not
restrain it from moving. Time of
stimulation 3-5 seconds.
These five
exercises will produce neurological
stimulations, none of which naturally
occur during this early period of life.
Experience shows that sometimes pups
will resist these exercises, others will
appear unconcerned. In either case a
caution is offered to those who plan to
use them. Do not repeat them more than
once per day and do not extend the time
beyond that recommended for each
exercise. Over stimulation of the
neurological system can have adverse and
detrimental results. These exercises
impact the neurological system by
kicking it into action earlier than
would be normally expected. The result
being an increased capacity that later
will help to make the difference in its
performance. Those who play with their
pups and routinely handle them should
continue to do so because the
neurological exercises are not
substitutions for routine handling, play
socialization or bonding.
Benefits of Stimulation
Five
benefits have been observed in canines
that were exposed to the Bio Sensor
stimulation exercises. The benefits
noted were:
1.
Improved
cardio vascular performance (heart
rate)
2.
Stronger
heart beats
3.
Stronger
adrenal glands
4.
More
tolerance to stress and
5.
Greater
resistance to disease.
In tests of
learning, stimulated pups were found to
be more active and were more exploratory
than their non- stimulated littermates
over which they were dominant in
competitive situations.
Secondary effects were also noted
regarding test performance. In simple
problem solving tests using detours in a
maze, the non-stimulated pups became
extremely aroused, wined a great deal,
and made many errors. Their stimulated
littermates were less disturbed or upset
by test conditions and when comparisons
were made, the stimulated littermates
were more calm in the test environment,
made fewer errors and gave only an
occasional distress when stressed.
Socialization
As
each animal grows and develops three
kinds of stimulation have been
identified that impact and influence how
it will develop and be shaped as an
individual. The first stage is called
early neurological stimulation, and the
second stage is called socialization.
The first two (early neurological
stimulation and socialization) have in
common a window of limited time. When
Lorenz, (1935) first wrote about the
importance of the stimulation process he
wrote about imprinting during early life
and its influence on the later
development of the individual. He states
that it was different from conditioning
in that it occurred early in life and
took place very rapidly producing
results which seemed to be permanent.
One of the first and perhaps the most
noted research efforts involving the
larger animals was achieved by Kellogg &
Kellogg (1933). As a student of Dr.
Kellogg's I found him and his wife to
have an uncanny interest in children and
young animals and the changes and the
differences that occurred during early
development. Their history making study
involved raising their own new born
child with a new born primate. Both
infants were raised together as if they
were twins. This study like others that
would follow attempted to demonstrate
that among the mammals there are great
differences in their speed of physical
and mental development. Some are born
relatively mature and quickly capable of
motion and locomotion, while others are
very immature, immobile and slow to
develop. For example, the Rhesus monkey
shows rapid and precocious development
at birth, while the chimpanzee and the
other "great apes" take much longer.
Last and slowest is the human infant.
One
of the earliest efforts to investigate
and look for the existence of
socialization in canines was undertaken
by Scott-Fuller (1965). In their early
studies they were able to demonstrate
that the basic technique for testing the
existence of socialization was to show
how readily adult animals would foster
young animals, or accept one from
another species. They observed that with
the higher level animals it is easiest
done by hand rearing. When the foster
animal transfers its social
relationships to the new species,
researchers conclude that socialization
has taken place. Most researchers agree
that among all species, a lack of
adequate socialization generally results
in unacceptable behavior and often times
produces undesirable aggression,
excessiveness, fearfulness, sexual
inadequacy, and indifference toward
partners.
Socialization studies confirm
that the critical periods for humans
(infant) to be stimulated are generally
between three weeks and twelve months of
age. For canines the period is shorter,
between the fourth and sixteenth week of
age. During these critical time periods
two things can go wrong. First,
insufficient social contact can
interfere with proper emotional
development which can adversely affected
the development of the human bond. The
lack of adequate social stimulation,
such as handling, mothering and contact
with others, adversely affects social
and psychological development.
Second, over mothering can prevent
sufficient exposure to other
individuals, and situations that have an
important influence on growth and
development. The literature shows that
humans and animals respond in similar
ways when denied minimal amounts of
stimulation. In humans, the absence of
love and cuddling increases the risk of
an aloof, distant, asocial or
sociopathic individual. Over mothering
can also have its detrimental effects.
It occurs when a patient insulates the
child from outside contacts, or keeps
the apron strings tight, thus limiting
opportunities to explore and interact.
In the end, over mothering generally
produces a dependent, socially
maladjusted and sometimes emotionally
disturbed individual.
The
absence of outside social interactions
for both children and pups usually
results in a lack of adequate learning
and social adjustment. Protected
youngsters who grow up in an insulated
environment often times become sickly,
despondent, lacking in flexibility and
unable to make simple social
adjustments. Generally, they are unable
to function productively or to interact
successfully then they become adults.
Owners who have busy life styles with
long and tiring work and social
schedules often times cause pets to be
neglected. Left to themselves with only
an occasional trip out of the house or
off of the property they seldom see
other canines or strangers and generally
suffer from poor stimulation and
socialization. For many, the side
effects of loneliness and boredom
set-in. The resulting behavior manifests
itself in the form of chewing, digging,
and hard to control behavior
(Battaglia).
It
seems clear that small amounts of stress
followed by early socialization can
produce beneficial results. The danger
seems to be in not knowing where the
thresholds are for over and under
stimulation. Many improperly socialized
youngsters develop into older
individuals unprepared for adult life,
unable to cope with its challenges, and
interactions. Attempts to re-socialize
them when adults have only produced
small gains. These failures confirm the
notion that the window of time open for
early neurological and social
stimulation only comes once. After it
passes, little or nothing can be done to
overcome the negative effects of too
much or too little stimulation.
The third and final stage in
the process of growth and development is
called enrichment. Unlike the first two
stages it has no time limit and by
comparison covers a very long period of
time. Enrichment is a term which has
come to mean the positive sum of
experiences, which have a cumulative
effect upon the individual. Enrichment
experiences typically involve exposure
to a wide variety of interesting, novel,
and exciting experiences with regular
opportunities to freely investigate,
manipulate, and interact with them. When
measured in later life, the results show
that those reared in an enriched
environment tend to be more inquisitive
and are more able to perform difficult
tasks. The educational TV program called
Sesame
Street is perhaps the best known example
of a children's enrichment program. The
results show that when tested, children
who regularly watched this program
performed better than playmates who did
not. Follow up studies show that those
who regularly watched Sesame tend to
seek a college education and when
enrolled, performed better than
playmates who were not regular watchers
of the Sesame Street Program.
There are numerous children
studies that show the benefits of
enrichment techniques and programs. Most
focus on improving self-esteem and
self-talk. Follow up studies show that
the enriched
Sesame
Street students when later tested were
brighter and scored above average and
most often were found to be the products
of environments that contributed to
their superior test scores. On the other
hand, those whose test scores were
generally below average, (labeled as
dull) and the products of
underprivileged or non- enriched
environments often times had little or
only small amounts of stimulation during
early childhood and only minimal amounts
of enrichment during their developmental
and formative years. Many were
characterized as children who grew up
with little interaction with others,
poor parenting, few toys, no books and a
steady diet of TV soap operas.
A
similar analogy can be found among
canines. All the time they are growing
they are learning because their nervous
systems are developing and storing
information that may be of inestimable
use at a later date. Studies by Scott
and Fuller confirm that non-enriched
pups when given free choice preferred to
stay in their kennels. Other litter
mates who were given only small amounts
of outside stimulation between five and
eight weeks of age were found to be very
inquisitive and very active. When kennel
doors were left open, the enriched pups
would come bounding out while
littermates who were not exposed to
enrichment would remain behind. The
non-stimulated pups would typically be
fearful of unfamiliar objects and
generally preferred to withdraw rather
than investigate. Even well bred pups of
superior pedigrees would not explore or
leave their kennels and many were found
difficult to train as adults. These pups
in many respects were similar to the
deprived children. They acted as if they
had become institutionalized, preferring
the routine and safe environment of
their kennel to the stimulating world
outside their immediate place of
residence.
Regular trips to the park, shopping
centers and obedience and agility
classes serve as good examples of
enrichment activities. Chasing and
retrieving a ball on the surface seems
to be enriching because it provides
exercise and includes rewards. While
repeated attempts to retrieve a ball
provide much physical activity, it
should not be confused with enrichment
exercises. Such playful activities
should be used for exercise and play or
as a reward after returning from a trip
or training session. Road work and
chasing balls are not substitutes for
trips to the shopping mall, outings or
obedience classes most of which provide
many opportunities for interaction and
investigation.
Finally it seems clear that
stress early in life can produce
beneficial results. The danger seems to
be in not knowing where the thresholds
are for over and under stimulation.
However, the absence or the lack of
adequate amounts of stimulation
generally will produce negative and
undesirable results. Based on the above
it is fair to say that the performance
of most individuals can be improved
including the techniques described
above. Each contributes in a cumulative
way and supports the next stage of
development.
Conclusion
Breeders can now take advantage
of the information available to improve
and enhance performance. Generally,
genetics account of about 35% of the
performance but the remaining 65%
(management, training, nutrition) can
make the difference. In the management
category it has been shown that breeders
should be guided by the rule that it is
generally considered prudent to guard
against under and over stimulation.
Short of ignoring pups during their
first two months of life, a conservative
approach would be to expose them to
children, people, toys and other animals
on a regular basis. Handling and
touching all parts of their anatomy is
also necessary to learn as early as the
third day of life. Pups that are handled
early and on a regular basis, generally
do not become hand shy as adults.
Because of the risks involved in under
stimulation a conservative approach to
using the benefits of the three stages
has been suggested based primarily on
the works of Arskeusky, Kellogg, Yearkes
and the "Bio Sensor" program (later
known as the "Super Dog Program").
Both experience and research have
dominated the beneficial effects that
can be achieved via early neurological
stimulation, socialization and
enrichment experiences. Each has been
used to improve performance and to
explain the differences that occur
between individuals, their trainability,
health and potential. The cumulative
effects of the three stages have been
well documented. They best serve the
interests of owners who seek high levels
of performance when properly used. Each
has a cumulative effect and contributes
to the development and the potential for
individual performance.